At Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:00:03 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <15aa9936-9bd8-c9e3-7ca1-394861073...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > On 2017/07/21 3:24, Robert Haas wrote: > > I think that's reasonable. This should be committed and back-patched > > to 9.6, right? > > Yeah, because direct modify was introduced in 9.6. > > Attached is the second version which updated docs in postgres-fdw.sgml > as well.
! no local joins for the query, no row-level local <literal>BEFORE</> or ! <literal>AFTER</> triggers on the target table, and no ! <literal>CHECK OPTION</> constraints from parent views. ! In <command>UPDATE</>, Might be a silly question, is CHECK OPTION a "constraint"? regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
