Hello, Robert.

Sorry, if I was rough. My English is not so excellent. My point is
that I was trying to distinguish  behavior of EDB installer and
"build from source" PG.

And the result is that EDB executes ALTER USER and I don't know why.

You wrote:

RH> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Pavel Golub <pa...@microolap.com> wrote:
>> One  more  notice.  ALTER  USER  ALL  works  in  EnterpriseDB 10beta2
>> installer. That's weird. I thought EnterpriseDB uses official sources.

RH> I find it really hard to believe that we're doing anything else.  It
RH> wouldn't make any sense to patch the PostgreSQL source code and then
RH> release the installers as PostgreSQL installers.  And if we *were*
RH> going to do that, wouldn't we patch something more interesting than
RH> the ALTER USER command?  I don't know what's going on here but I have
RH> a feeling that EnterpriseDB secretly maintaining patch sets that we
RH> inject into our PostgreSQL installers is not that thing.

RH> Adding a few EDB people.

With best wishes,
 Pavel                          mailto:pa...@gf.microolap.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to