Hello, Robert. Sorry, if I was rough. My English is not so excellent. My point is that I was trying to distinguish behavior of EDB installer and "build from source" PG.
And the result is that EDB executes ALTER USER and I don't know why. You wrote: RH> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Pavel Golub <pa...@microolap.com> wrote: >> One more notice. ALTER USER ALL works in EnterpriseDB 10beta2 >> installer. That's weird. I thought EnterpriseDB uses official sources. RH> I find it really hard to believe that we're doing anything else. It RH> wouldn't make any sense to patch the PostgreSQL source code and then RH> release the installers as PostgreSQL installers. And if we *were* RH> going to do that, wouldn't we patch something more interesting than RH> the ALTER USER command? I don't know what's going on here but I have RH> a feeling that EnterpriseDB secretly maintaining patch sets that we RH> inject into our PostgreSQL installers is not that thing. RH> Adding a few EDB people. -- With best wishes, Pavel mailto:pa...@gf.microolap.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers