On 13/08/17 16:19, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

I'd vote for including this in v10.  There doesn't seem to be any
downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
case when we can see it coming.

But explosions are fun!
< ducks, and runs away VERY rapidly>

More seriously:
Up to now I'd been avoiding hash indexes, so great news!


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to