On 13/08/17 16:19, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
[...]
I'd vote for including this in v10. There doesn't seem to be any downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table case when we can see it coming.
But explosions are fun! < ducks, and runs away VERY rapidly> More seriously: Up to now I'd been avoiding hash indexes, so great news! Cheers, Gavin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
