Re: Thomas Munro 2017-08-10 
> > Agreed.  Here's a version that skips those useless detail messages
> > using a coding pattern I found elsewhere.
> Rebased after bf6b9e94.

> message ? errdetail("Diagnostic message: %s", message) : 0));

"Diagnostic message" doesn't really mean anything, and printing
"DETAIL: Diagnostic message: <something>" seems redundant to me. Maybe
drop that prefix? It should be clear from the context that this is a
message from the LDAP layer.

Or maybe simply append ": <message>" to the error message already shown?


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to