Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thomas Munro 2017-08-10
> <CAEepm=09jnv7hk5rtxpp816bmuve7djgbjtecjexrhaelhf...@mail.gmail.com>
> > > Agreed. Here's a version that skips those useless detail messages
> > > using a coding pattern I found elsewhere.
> >
> > Rebased after bf6b9e94.
>
> > message ? errdetail("Diagnostic message: %s", message) : 0));
>
> "Diagnostic message" doesn't really mean anything, and printing
> "DETAIL: Diagnostic message: <something>" seems redundant to me. Maybe
> drop that prefix? It should be clear from the context that this is a
> message from the LDAP layer.
I think making it visible that the message comes from LDAP (rather than
Postgres or anything else) is valuable. How about this?
LOG: could not start LDAP TLS session: Protocol error
DETAIL: LDAP diagnostics: unsupported extended operation.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
