Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 8/31/17 08:19, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I think that, in the end, covered all the comments?
> I didn't see any explanation of what this would actually be useful for. > I suppose you could skip over some changes you don't want replicated, > but how do you find to what position to skip? Um ... I can see how you might expect to skip some events in a logical replication stream and have a chance of things not being utterly broken. But how can that work for physical replication? Missed updates are normally spelled "unrecoverable data corruption" at that level. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers