> On 11 September 2017 at 23:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Uh, what? Sure you can. Just because the existing code never has a > reason to create such a dependency doesn't mean it wouldn't work.
Well, I thought that `pg_depend` was not intended to be used from user-defined code and it's something "internal". But if I'm wrong then maybe the problem Arhur raised is a valid reason for that.
