On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com > wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The attached patch fixes both the review comments as discussed above. > > This cost stuff looks unstable: > > test select_parallel ... FAILED > > ! Gather (cost=0.00..623882.94 rows=9976 width=8) > Workers Planned: 4 > ! -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..623882.94 rows=2494 > width=8) > (3 rows) > > drop function costly_func(var1 integer); > --- 112,120 ---- > explain select ten, costly_func(ten) from tenk1; > QUERY PLAN > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > ! Gather (cost=0.00..625383.00 rows=10000 width=8) > Workers Planned: 4 > ! -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..625383.00 rows=2500 > width=8) > (3 rows) > that should be fixed by turning costs on the explain, as is the tradition. See attached. Cheers, Jeff
parallel_paths_include_tlist_cost_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
