Yes, I would like to see the vacuum delay patch go into 7.4.1 if possible. It's really useful. I don't think there is any major risk in adding the delay patch into a minor revision given the small amount of code change.
Stephen ""Matthew T. O'Connor"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tom Lane wrote: > > >Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>As a matter of fact, people who have performance problems are likely to > >>be the same who have upgrade problems. And as Gaetano pointed out > >>correctly, we will see wildforms with one or the other feature applied. > >> > >> > > > >I'd believe that for patches of the size of my original VACUUM-delay > >hack (or even a production-grade version of same, which'd probably be > >10x larger). The kind of wholesale rewrite you are currently proposing > >is much too large to consider folding back into 7.4.*, IMHO. > > > > > Do people think that the VACUUM-delay patch by itself, would be usefully > enough on it's own to consider working it into 7.4.1 or something? From > the little feedback I have read on the VACUUM-delay patch used in > isolation, it certainly does help. I would love to see it put into 7.4 > somehow. > > The far more rigorous changes that Jan is working on, will be welcome > improvements for 7.5. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
