In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I've been looking (and coded) a little bit on named function calls. > Calls on the form: > > foo (x => 13, y => 42) > > Implementing this means that the symbol => no longer can be defined > by the user as an operator. It's not used as default in pg, but I > just want to tell you up front in case you don't like that. > > It's specified as => in the todo, and it's the symbol used by oracle > in their pl/sql so I hope it's okay that I steal that symbol? >
You can't be stealing it if it's in the TODO :) Oh, and Peter E, please consider putting a sock in the "No!" you almost always pipe up with. It's getting boring. Cheers, D -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778 America is like a melting pot: The people on the bottom get burned and the scum floats to the top. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
