Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course it's ambiguous. Just as f(a,b) is ambiguous in C. It could > mean call f with two arguments, or it could mean call f with the > result of the expression "a,b". It's "fixed" by just declaring "," > special inside function calls. If you want to use the operator in the > function call you have to use an extra set of parentheses.
This doesn't apply very well to Postgres, though. For us ',' is not a legal operator name anywhere. We used to have some conflicts between punctuation and operator names --- at one point, there were actually standard operators named ';' and ':' if you can believe that. We got rid of those cases because of the amount of pain they caused, and I'm not eager to introduce a new one. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]