On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, elein wrote:
> Barring any override from the SQL200x standard,
> I would strongly suggest AS, too.
I kind of like AS also now after thinking about it. The only reason for =>
is that oracle used it, nothing else.
As I wrote in another mail, I will check out sql200x.
> > foo (13 as x, 42 as y)
The only question now is if it should be that we call the function with
the variable x AS the value 13, or if we call the function with 13 AS the
variable x. I.e.
foo (13 as x)
or
foo (x as 13)
I don't know if one is more natural then the other in english. To my
swedish ear both sounds as good. I like (x as 13) a little better, but I
don't really care much what way around it will be.
--
/Dennis Björklund
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
