Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Agreed, but you are a "me too", not a huge percentage of our userbase. > > How do you know? Have you polled our complete userbase? > > > Basically, after 6-7 months of development, I want more than a vacuum > > patch and a new cache replacement policy. I want something big, in > > fact, several big things. > > Most likely won't happen, since what is considered big by you isn't > necessarily what is considered big by someone else ... as Hannu, and I > believe, Jan, have so far pointed out to you ...
I can't poll for everything. I make my own educated guesses. For a small percentage, vacuum delay and ARC are significant. For a larger percentage, PITR, Win32, tablespaces, and nested transactions are significant. I don't need to take a poll for that, and a "me too" doesn't change that fact. To say otherwise is to pretend that all our enhancements are of equal significance. Sure, for a given individual some are very important, but in the aggregate things are pretty easy to guess. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
