On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:48 PM, Dave Page wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46
<snip />
I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().
I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
think of anything better at the moment though (maybe
pg_component_size,
but that's equally random) :-(
Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)
I'm still unclear as to what exactly is trying to be captured by the
names, so I'll just throw some out and see if they're intuitive to
anyone.
pg_table_extensions_size()
pg_table_support_size()
pg_relation_extensions_size()
pg_relation_support_size()
pg_relation_extended_size()
My two yen... if that :)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
