* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:59:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I kinda suspect that the cmpb test is a no-op or loss on all > >> Intelish processors: > > > I think an important question is wether this is for x86_64 in > > general, of opteron specific. It could be that it's not the same > > on Intel's EM64Ts. > > Good point --- anyone have one to try?
I've got one I can test on. I need to upgrade the kernel and some other
things on it though (it's running 2.6.8 atm, and an older
Debian/unstable which I should probably bring up to current).
I'll work on it starting now and post results once I get some.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
