"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:45:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jim, are you interested
>> in seeing if this patch makes the problem go away for you?
> Well, this is a production system... what's the risk with that patch?
Well, it's utterly untested, which means it might crash your system,
which is where you are now, no?
> BTW, is it typical to see a 10 difference between asserts on and off? My
> client has a process that was doing 10-20 records/sec with asserts on
> and 90-110 with asserts off.
Not typical, but I can believe there are some code paths like that.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
