Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, a very simple test shows that the libintl printf does indeed do 
> %m$ processing:
> ...
> So the next question is why isn't it working in the build.

Is it possible that the build that was being complained of was using our
previous, very-broken snprintf.c?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to