Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
And MySQL is much closer to being a competitor now than they were in
4.1. And feature-wise they'll probably equal PostgreSQL in the next
release. Will the features be anywhere near as robust or well thought
out? No. But in a heck of a lot of companies that doesn't matter.
Don't forget that they got nested transactions and PITR both before us.
They will also shortly have really nice partitioning before us...
...don't underestimate their development speed.
Second that. In addition they have (early) in-memory multi-node
clustering and Jim Starkey is writing them a new transactional storage
engine to replace the probably-soon-to-be-license-hampered Innodb...
Cheers
Mark
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
