* Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > . MERGE (at least in PK case) > > I think that died after we figured out that it didn't do the sort of > UPDATE-else-INSERT thing that people wanted out of it.
I agree that it's probably not going to happen for 8.2 but I certainly have uses for the SQL spec's definition of MERGE (table-level instead of the individual-tuple case). I'd like to see the individual-tuple UPSERT/REPLACE issue handled as well but I don't believe MERGE lacking that necessairly means MERGE should be ignored.. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature