Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > >> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06 > > > > > > We could do that, but once an item is done I don't see the point in > > having the date and person's name. You are right that is clearly a > > different purpose from the TODO list, and if someone wants to track > > that, it might help things. > > The idea of the above is not to track when it is done. THe "confirmed" > is to track that development is taking place and that we have confirmed > from the developer that they think it will be done for 8.2.
Oh, "confirmed" confused me. Maybe "anticipated" or "planned" for 8.2. > It is something that in theory would update throughout the cycle 3 or 4 > times. You could even have: > > Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 04/20/06 > > > Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > option is no longer needed | PeterE | Trouble encountered | 06/20/06 > > Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > option is no longer needed | PeterE | Asks for help | 08/20/06 > > Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > option is no longer needed | Alvaro | Confirmed | 09/20/06 > > Notice the sequence of events. I am not saying the specific statuses are > the way to go but it would give a simple way to keep tabs on things > without having to create a whole new ball of yarn. Interesting idea. If people willing to state they will complete items for the next release, I can add this to the TODO list, and just remove it once the item is in CVS. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
