Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > It seems some people like the authoritative TODO list, and others want a > > TODO wiki that they can add stuff to without having to get community > > buy-in. I have trouble seeing how the wiki doesn't just end up being a > > blog of ideas, but I see no harm in it as long as it is clear the items > > haven't passed community review. > > I think it is a combination of the two. A wiki could be used to discuss > ideas for todos, it could be used to describe TODOs in actual detail, it > could used (in conjunction with Trac) to be able to document dependecies > for todos... etc.
But what is it likely to do? I don't think much, but if we can shut it down if we decide it isn't of value (unlike gborg which can't be shut down), I think it is fine to try. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org