Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I merely said that the way the patch was presented, with significant 
> > code refactoring mixed in, I couldn't review it (as effectively as 
> > perhaps otherwise).  FWIW, I believe that the general approach is 
> > sound, but I haven't actually "reviewed" the patch completely.
> Given the multiple problems already found, I feel quite uncomfortable
> with putting it back in until another set of eyeballs has been over
> it.  Do you have time to do a full review anytime soon?  I'm trying
> to deal with all the other stuff in the queue, and so would prefer
> not to spend my own time on it ...

Peter, you also commented on an error message displayed, so I assume
you did look it over somewhat.  I agree it would be best for Peter to
review it.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to