Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I merely said that the way the patch was presented, with significant > > code refactoring mixed in, I couldn't review it (as effectively as > > perhaps otherwise). FWIW, I believe that the general approach is > > sound, but I haven't actually "reviewed" the patch completely. > > Given the multiple problems already found, I feel quite uncomfortable > with putting it back in until another set of eyeballs has been over > it. Do you have time to do a full review anytime soon? I'm trying > to deal with all the other stuff in the queue, and so would prefer > not to spend my own time on it ...
Peter, you also commented on an error message displayed, so I assume you did look it over somewhat. I agree it would be best for Peter to review it. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend