Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:40:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This is also an interesting example for a tracker.  If we had one, all
> > discussion on the patch would be in one place, but I am thinking that
> > would require all posting to happen in a browser, or somehow have emails
> > tagged to attach to each item.   Is that something that can happen
> > easily?  I don't know.  Would the repost of a patch be attached to the
> > original submission?
> In debbugs for example, the bug gets an email address
> <bugnumber> Anything sent to that address gets
> recorded in the bug. So as long as people hit "reply-to-all" the whole
> thread will be archived in the bug.
> I assume other bug trackers have a similar feature...

Oh, so the bug is tracked by being part of the email reply list.  That
is a good idea.  Now, how does that get assigned for non-bugs, like
patches?  Does any email sent to the lists that doesn't already have a
bug number get one?  That might be really valuable.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to