Tom Lane ha scritto:
Matteo Beccati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I cannot see anything bad by using something like that:
if (histogram is large/representative enough)
Well, the question is exactly what is "large enough"? I feel a bit
uncomfortable about applying the idea to a histogram with only 10
entries (especially if we ignore two of 'em). With 100 or more,
it sounds all right. What's the breakpoint?
Yes, I think 100-200 could be a good breakpoint. I don't actually know
what is the current usage of SET STATISTICS, I usually set it to 1000
for columns which need more precise selectivity.
The breakpoint could be set even higher (500?) so there is space to
increase statistics without enabling the histogram check, but I don't
feel very comfortable though suggesting this kind of possibly
undocumented side effect...
Best ragards
--
Matteo Beccati
http://phpadsnew.com
http://phppgads.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
