Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok - the planner switches to a different plan at about 2.5GB of
> effective_cache_size resulting in the following [ much better ] plan:

OK, so it sounds like it'd be a good idea to try to pro-rate
effective_cache_size among all the tables in the query.  I'll see
if I can get that in without kluging the code up too much.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to