> subject says it all. pg_regress starts "postmaster" 
> (pg_regress.c, line 1515). Shouldn't this be "postgres" these days?
> (Yes, I'm aware that I wrote that code ;-) But this just occurred to
> me..)

Actually, a second thought given that I was just bitten by the
run-tests-as-admin-doesn't-work - should we use pg_ctl to start it?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to