>>> they change their business model, if and if. >> That is no different than the open source offerings. We have >> had several open source offerings that have died over the >> years. Replicator, for example has always been Replicator and >> has been around longer than any of the current replication solutions. > > I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name > in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that > can be more easily updated. And that can contain both free and non-free > projects, under clear headlines showing the difference. > > The documentation is about PostgreSQL, not about third-party products, > be they free or commercial. Our *website*, however, should give guidance > on which specific products we (as a community) know are stable and > usable along with PostgreSQL (as we do today under downloads, but could > very well do based on specific uses like replication as well) >
I can agree with this :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend