Tom Lane wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name > > in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that > > can be more easily updated. > > I agree with that. If we have statements about other projects in our > docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those > statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change.
I mention only Slony and pgpool as examples of replication types. They seem to have risen to high enough visiblity to do that. I have not mentioned any other solutions. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
