> Gee, thanks. Perhaps one might consider the license a reason why some
> might prefer GNUTLS and would like to see the option? I'm pretty
> confident that Debian, at least, would switch to using GNUTLS for
> Postgres were it available. It's certainly something we'd like to see
> supported by upstream as an alternative to OpenSSL. Given the patch is
> available it's possible we could just apply it locally (as was done w/
> OpenLDAP) but I really don't think anyone would like to see that.
I am not the one you need to convince :). I honestly don't care that
much. I am just trying to help clean up the TODO list. If you want the
GNU TLS patch accepted, you should probably start a thread about that
problem specifically.
Currently, Tom Lane does not like how invasive the patch is. So someone
is going to have to convince him this is a good idea or some of the
other committers.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
