On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 14:28 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> > > certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> > > useless extra step in my case).
> >
> > Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team a
> > potentially useful would be to allow the use of ssh keys for
> > authentication.
> >
> > SSH keys are far more prevalent, and they are understood even at the
> > medium corporate level.
>
> While this may be true it's certainly also true that X.509 keys are
> understood at both the medium corporate level and mid-level gov't (at
> least in the US), especially inside the DOD, where they've been
> mandated, as I recall.
I am not against X.509 at all. I was saying that instead of PGP, ssh
keys may make more sense.
J
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
