Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 19:52 schrieb Tom Lane: > Not only is it overzealous, but the proposal to have one reflects a > failure to learn from history. GUC variables that change > transaction-boundary semantics are a bad idea, period: see autocommit.
But this option would not, in fact, change the transaction-boundary semantics. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
