"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Comments, objections? Also, any thoughts about the names to use for > these new node types? As I commented last year, I'm not completely > happy with "TopPlan" because it won't actually be a subtype of Plan, > but I don't have a better idea. Also I'm unsure what to call the > cut-down RangeTblEntry struct; maybe RunTimeRangeTblEntry?
My only though is that I suspect this will somehow relate to the cte stuff I was doing for recursive queries. I'm not exactly clear how yet though. I think this has more to do with the RangeTable stuff than the TopPlan though. I was probably going to need a new kind of RangeTable representing a Subquery that was a reference to a cte rather than a separate subquery. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
