Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > Now we have --with-libxml (and USE_LIBXML constant for #ifdef-s), what > is not absolutely right: XML support is smth that is more general than > "using libxml2 library". E.g., some SQL/XML publishing functions (such > as XMLPI) do not deal with libxml2. > > Also, in the future more "non-libxml" functionality could be added to > "XML support" (well, Peter's recent SQL-to-XML mapping functions prove > it). > > I think it'd better to rename configure option to --enable-xml and > USE_LIBXML to ENABLE_XML. I'll do it if there are no objections.
Advertising
I think it would be better that leaving --with-libxml out (i.e. compiling without libxml2 support) would only disable those parts in XML functionality that require libxml2 for their implementation; the rest of the stuff should be compiled in regardless of the setting. Is this not what is done currently? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
