> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm confused. If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need > >> any new code at all? > > > I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is > > same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as > > EUC_JIS_2004. > > I'm still confused. If the set of characters is different, then surely > we need at least a different UTF8<->EUC_JIS_2004 conversion function?
Yes, exactly. I will come up with new conversions later. > After that I will develop conversion part(it will take several days). -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly