Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It should be standard docs imo. PDF is a heck of a lot easier to read if >> you have a good PDF reader. > > Just out of curiosity, what would that be? I've used both Acrobat and > Preview, and I do not like either.
I use Evince personally. I used to like Acrobat but it has gotten really bloated. However the best one I have ever seen is kpdf, but I have never been able to get KDE stable for me (I am not interested in a thread on this ;)). The big thing for me, is a single document, zero clicks, that is searchable. PDF and plain text are the only thing that give me that. If you are really zealous you can even use Beagle (which I don't) to preindex the PDF for you for easy searching. > > (As to the original point, I'm all for fixing the "PDF accessibility > features" Hugh mentioned, but I'm afraid it may be a research project > to find out how/whether our document production tools can do that.) Yeah possibly. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly