Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we want to have an idle_in_statement_timeout then we'll need to introduce a
> select loop instead of just directly blocking on recv anyways. Does that mean
> we may as well bite the bullet now?

If we wanted such a timeout (which I personally don't) we wouldn't
implement it with select because OpenSSL wouldn't cooperate.  AFAICS
this'd require setting a timer interrupt ... and then unsetting it when
the client response comes back.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to