On May 1, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

Henry B. Hotz wrote:

On May 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I think that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with - sec is a


If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?

I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable
without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar with it.


gss-noprot and gss-prot

gss-noenc and gss-enc


The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to