Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> >   
> >> So if the commercial
> >> backers of PostgreSQL want better management of the project, maybe they
> >> need to find some resources to help out.
> >>     
> >
> > I don't think they really care, or we'd have heard something by now.  I 
> > think this is up to us PG developers.
> >
> >   
> Well, I have no confidence that any formal system will succeed without 
> someone trusted by core and committers stepping up to the plate to do 
> the required ongoing legwork.
> As for voting on patches, that seems a most un-postgres-like way of 
> doing things. What is more, it assumes that multiple people will be 
> reviewing patches. Our trouble right now is finding even one qualified 
> reviewer with enough time for some patches.

The typical use-case is that someone is going to like the patch, but
what X changed in it, so a simple vote isn't going to work, and neither
is automatic patch application.  Rarely is a patch applied unmodified by
the applier.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to