Bruce Momjian wrote:
If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this
email is from Simon from January, 2007.
I don't think anyone (at least sanely) questions that there are patches
hanging out there.
Joshua D. Drake
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
that the holiday break is over:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
The following patches don't appear on this list:
Concurrent psql
Original submission
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php
Latest
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php
Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html
WAL Index Split
Original submission
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php
Latest
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php
Grouped Items
Latest
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php
Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html
Maintain Cluster Order
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php
All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
application/rejection.
I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
