On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
> should have broken every last man jack of 'em.  And yet there's still
> some green to be seen.  I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
> test scaffolding.  For instance, dragonfly claims a green build, but
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dragonfly&dt=2007-06-04%20043001&stg=ecpg-check
> shows this interesting trace:
> ...
> testing connect/test2.pgc                      ... ./pg_regress: bad 
> substitution

Is it possible to find out which line is reporting this error? Looks to
me like some incompatibility on the shell side.

Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to