Marko Kreen wrote:
As I understand, JMS does not have a concept of transactions, probably also other solutions mentioned before, so to use PgQ as backend for them should be much simpler...
JMS certainly does have the concept of transactions. Both distributed ones through XA and two-phase commit, and local involving just one JMS provider. I don't know about others, but would be surprised if they didn't.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
