Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
> >>>> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
> >>> Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
> >>> deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
> >>> the commit.  GUC as full_commit_recovery?
> >> 
> >> recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure.
> > commit_stability?  reliable_commit?
> What's wrong with synchronous_commit?  It's accurate and simple.

That is fine too.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to