[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So, final propose: > rename cfglocale to cfglanguages and store in it array of laguage names > which is produced from first part of locale names: > russian '{ru_RU, Russian_Russia}' > spanish '{es_ES, es_CL, Spanish_Spain, Spanish_Chile}' > > Comments?
Why not do it the other way around? es_ES spanish Spanish_Spain spanish ru_RU russian pt_BR portuguese_brazil That way you don't need any funny index. Or do you need the list of locales for each language? (but even if you do, you can easily obtain it by indexing both columns separately using btrees anyway) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/ "I can see support will not be a problem. 10 out of 10." (Simon Wittber) (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-12/msg00159.php) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq