Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 15:25 schrieb Stefan Kaltenbrunner:
>>>> a lot of those are simply noise (like the LOOP VECTORIZED stuff from
>>>> icc boxes or the "statement not reached" spam from the sun compilers)
>>>> but others might indicate real issues.
>>>> To find warnings that might be a real problem we might want to look
>>>> suppressing those - if possible - using compiler switches.
>>> It would be good to determine an appropriate set of compiler switches
>>> to reduce the warnings to a reasonable level.
>> yeah once we have determined that this whole experiment is useful it
>> should be pretty easy to tweak the compiler switches for the non-gcc
>> compilers (mostly icc and sun studio seem to be the ones that generate
>> excessive output).
> For sun studio -erroff=E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED is useful there. If you
> want to determine warning tags for each warning add -errtags.
Is that supported on all versions of sun studio(Sun WorkShop 6, Sun
Studio 8,11) we have on the farm ?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly