Hi, On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:22 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > I'm checking into this, but it may take a few days to get an answer > > (particularly since I'm planning to take Friday through Monday off). > > Well if we go RHEL why not CentOS5 and just call it good?
...because RHEL and CentOS are not really that identical. They are just binary-compilant. RHEL has better performance than CentOS -- I guess it is the compiler options that Red Hat is using while compiling their RPMs. I have performed a test using OSDL test suite a few months ago on a system that has: * 8 x86_64 CPUs @ 3200.263 * 16 Gigabytes of RAM * PostgreSQL 8.1.5 (PGDG packages) and RHEL performed much better than CentOS. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
