hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:34:32PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
That seems a confusing set of values. Perhaps "off", "pl", and "all"
would be clearer?
I'm curious if you've measured the performance overhead of enabling this
functionality.
i'm quite worried about "all" setting.
all operators are functions as well, so tracking literally all function
calls might be too heavy.
"all" would additionally count only C and SQL functions, builtins (language
"internal") are skipped. Maybe there should be option to count these as well,
perhaps with a really scare name (track_functions = all_plus_internal).
on the other hand i would like to be able to track some non-pl functions
like RI%.
These are builtin.
Regards,
Martin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
