* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I think that's a good idea. Attached is a patch that implements this (I > think - haven't messed around in that area of the code before). Thoughts?
Cool, thanks! My only comment is that you should probably stick to one 'zero' convention- either '!canlogin' or 'canlogin == 0'. I prefer the former, but the inconsistancy in a single patch is kind of odd. I'm not sure if there's an overall PG preference. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature