Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 
> months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea?   It might be hard to pull 
> off, but we won't know until we try.

It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it
doesn't work.

Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking
only a month of work between commit-fests.  I like a two-month cycle
partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always
know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like
that, is commit-fest time.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to