Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2
> months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to pull
> off, but we won't know until we try.
It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it
doesn't work.
Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking
only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle
partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always
know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like
that, is commit-fest time.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
