Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what
>> changed and it is 56 different things ;)
>> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it
>> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying
>> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument
>> I made. 
> We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
> actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.

That's sounding a lot like mysql.. Next you'll start recommending people
to run that in production.. :-P


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to