Seems like the debate has flared again.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gunnar Rĝnning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Per-Olof Norén" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

> Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that
> > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
> > best solution here.
> 500k of binaries?  You just lost the argument.  That's not an acceptable
> amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.

I don´t see why the size of ant will be a problem. Could you please explain
to me?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

Reply via email to