Seems like the debate has flared again. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gunnar Rĝnning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Per-Olof Norén" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:22 AM Subject: Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!
> Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works > > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the > > best solution here. > > 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable > amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution. I don´t see why the size of ant will be a problem. Could you please explain to me? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
